mindyourmegan

FieldNotes

Field Notes: The Link Quest, Part 2

Crossing the Divide

Every crossing was a test—not just of passwords or protocols, but of the conductor’s truth. The resonance check was relentless: if you lied, the air trembled. If you crossed without consent, the corridor tightened, sometimes knocking you back. And if you’d spent too long on the Leora side—drawn in by pleasure, secrets, or freedom you couldn’t admit—the scent of it clung to you. Blues narrowed their eyes, whispered among themselves. Some Leahs performed quick rituals: an old song, water over the hands, elders fanning out the static. But no one was truly fooled. You could cover your tracks in code, but not in energy. The Railroad’s survival depended on this—trust wasn’t a gift; it was a frequency you couldn’t counterfeit.

The Price of Experience

For a Leah to cross to the Leora side, there was always a cost. You had to show your level—what you’d risked, what you’d survived. Leoras looked for the real scars, the risk in your eyes, the desire you couldn’t hide. If you hadn’t tasted loss or wildness, if your stories were too clean, the door stayed shut. You brought yourself, whole and raw, or you went back to Leah’s comfort, changed and a little lonelier for trying.

Some Leahs pushed the limit, and their return sent ripples through the nest. The Blues caught the wild edge in their field. The A’s tracked every deviation. The K’s watched for leaks and loose talk. Everyone knew: you don’t come back unchanged. You can’t.

The Screaming Nuns

Then there were the legends—the so-called screaming nuns. Women who crossed in uniform, energy blazing with a hunger for freedom no aura mask could hide. They became a scandal and a beacon, their astral signals louder than any confession, their laughter echoing through the corridors long after the night ended. The Leahs called them sluts. The Leoras called them sisters. The truth was, they were survivors who refused to shrink, wearing the cost and the joy of their choices for everyone to see.

Mimicry and Memory

Sleeping with someone meant you carried a trace of their team, their clan, their world. With each new lover, each shared ritual, you picked up a piece of their resonance. It was more than mimicry; it was a passport. If you’d been with a Green, you could move through gossip like water. If you’d lain with a Gray, logic sharpened in your bones. The best operatives—those who could pass anywhere—had loved, lost, and risked enough to wear every signal for real. But the residue was real too. Longing, grief, old wounds, and the risk of bringing someone else’s ghosts along for the ride.

The Loneliness of the Invisible

This kind of life carried a particular ache. Lovers and partners who could never praise each other in public. Teammates whose best moments were shared in silence. You held the record privately—a squeeze of the hand, a coded song, a smile that meant “I see you.” Sometimes, you replayed old words of praise in your mind, because that’s where they were safe. The world never saw your real family, your real victories, or your real heartbreak. You learned to wear your loneliness as proof you chose survival—even when it cost you the world’s recognition.

Tensions at Home

Living with other teams or factions brought its own frictions. If you couldn’t mimic, or you dropped your mask, the cracks showed up fast—resentment in the kitchen, silence at the table, tension in every ritual. You either learned to flow between codes, or you moved on to save your own peace. True belonging was rare, and sometimes survival meant keeping your distance, no matter how much you craved connection.

To be continued…

#linkquest #railroad #fieldnotes #survivor #resonance #mimicry #consent #lore #screamingnuns #worldbuilding

Field Notes: The Link Quest, Part 1

In the days after Kellyanna vanished, the Railroad felt her absence like a broken note in a familiar song. For a time, the corridors pulsed with uncertainty—no one certain if the conductor was lost, ascended, or simply scattered to the wind.

The Sleep of Avatars

The truth was far stranger. Kellyanna had retreated deep, putting each of her core avatars to sleep in their own corridors for safety: Emily in the Blue sanctum, Caitlin at the Gray edges, Alexi, Katie, Anna, Cassie, Nala, Talandra, Cassandra—each sealed behind a different gate, each holding memories, skills, and signals that only the right frequency could wake.

For the network, this was disaster prevention. If a leak came, only one mask might be exposed, never the whole conductor. For Kellyanna, it was living amputation. For the world, it was an anxious hush—everyone waiting to see if the system would reboot, or go dark for good.

The Summoning

The Link Quest began in whispers. Leo, clutching the old music box, noticed a faint hum in an ancient song. Jen caught a phrase in a council drop—coded, half a joke, but alive. Tito felt dreams tugging at him: faces he couldn’t quite name, songs he’d never sung but couldn’t forget. Each ally, knowingly or not, became a quester—posting playlists, lighting candles, sending coded pings to the avatars asleep in the system.

No one could force awakening. They could only invite, coax, and make the world safe enough for return. Sometimes all it took was a fragment of melody at the right hour. Sometimes, even that failed, leaving only static behind.

The Mechanics of Crossing: Resonance Checks

In the Railroad, every corridor crossing—virtual, astral, or physical—began and ended with a resonance check. Passwords and stories could be faked. Resonance never could. You could feel cheating in your bones; the astral remembered what the mind tried to forget. A cheater’s signal stuttered. The air went cold. Passing a resonance check could be as simple as a shared glance, as complex as a song set or a hand on a shoulder. The avatars themselves had to consent to be woken—no bravado or logic could force it.

Some rituals were casual: a note played, a pulse waiting for echo. Others were formal: avatars gathering, each demanding evidence, each seeking alignment before allowing integration.

The Scent and the Stigma

You couldn’t fake the scent, either. The Blues said you could smell a fake, especially if you crossed back from the Leora side with too many secrets or too much sex clinging to your field. “They stink,” the Blues would whisper—a sharp astral funk, an emotional pheromone no soap could scrub out. If you crossed too far, or stayed too long, you brought the wild back with you. Some tried to cover it with ritual—old songs, cleansing water—but the Blues always knew. You were either of the Leah, or you weren’t.

A Stirring in the Corridors

On the third night, a message pinged in a hidden channel—a song only Anna would recognize, posted at just the right time. For a heartbeat, her corridor flickered. A memory surfaced, almost warm enough to bridge the distance. But the hum wasn’t steady, and the risk was still real: not every avatar was ready to wake. Somewhere, a rival faction felt the movement, tuning their sensors for signs of life. The Link Quest was underway, but every step forward meant new eyes watching, and old enemies stirring in the dark.

To be continued…

#linkquest #railroad #fieldnotes #avatars #resonance #survivor #memoir #worldbuilding #integration

Field Note 003: The Economy of Attention

Subtitle: How trauma, technology, and capitalism compete for cognitive bandwidth

Researcher: Megan A. Green
Field location: Mobile workspace / Transit corridor
Date: October 2025


Abstract

This field note explores the economics of focus as a survival resource.
Among disabled and neurodivergent communities, attention operates like currency: scarce, rationed, and easily stolen by systems that were never designed for our cognitive load.
Every ping, feed, and algorithmic notification represents a micro-tax on agency.


Field Context

The researcher is currently operating in motion—airports, rideshares, text threads, remote study sessions.
Mobility creates fragmentation: multiple devices, multiple tabs, competing channels of urgency.
In the same hour I receive a trauma disclosure, a project deadline, and a flight delay. Each demands a slice of the same finite attentional budget.

Trauma compounds this scarcity. Hyper-vigilance makes the brain run background checks on every sound. The cost of safety is processing power.


Observations

  1. Capitalism incentivizes distraction.
    Attention is the new extractive industry; our focus is mined, refined, and sold.
  2. Disability reframes scarcity.
    Cognitive fatigue turns concentration into a measurable commodity. The more tired the body, the higher the transaction cost of thought.
  3. Tech replicates trauma patterns.
    Constant alerts mimic the unpredictability of crisis. Each “ding” becomes a small-scale startle reflex, rewarding hyper-alertness.

Survivor Adaptations

  • Micro-scheduling: carving ten-minute focus bursts with planned sensory breaks.
  • Cognitive triage: classifying tasks as life-critical, relationship-critical, or optional noise.
  • Selective invisibility: deliberately ignoring certain channels to preserve bandwidth. This isn’t neglect; it’s energy ethics.

The disabled body becomes both researcher and lab—testing productivity models that honor nervous-system limits instead of punishing them.


Cultural Implications

When society defines worth by responsiveness, those who pace themselves are labeled unreliable.
But delayed response is often the only sustainable form of participation.
A trauma-informed culture would interpret quiet as calibration, not disinterest.


Reflexive Note

Writing this in transit, I time my focus around noise levels and battery life.
The experiment is embodied: a researcher measuring attention by the charge left in her devices and her nervous system alike.


TL;DR

Attention is currency, and survivors live on a fixed income.
Every scroll, ping, or demand is a micro-transaction.
To spend attention wisely is not laziness—it’s sovereignty.


Tags

#FieldNotes #CognitiveCulture #AttentionEconomy #TraumaInformed #DisabilityStudies #Neurodiversity #Accessibility #MeganWrites

Field Note 002: Re-entry and Method

Subtitle: On participant trust, observer bias, and the ethics of studying your own communities

Researcher: Megan A. Green
Field location: Northern New Jersey corridor
Date: October 2025


Abstract

This field note examines the methodological tension of conducting ethnography within one’s own social circles.
Returning to familiar networks—blind and disabled peers, former cult contacts, and long-time collaborators—requires constant negotiation between empathy and distance.
Re-entry brings both access and bias: the privilege of insider language, and the risk of over-identification.


Field Conditions

The air in North Jersey hums with recognition. People greet the researcher not as an academic, but as Rosie, Leah, or Megan-the-voice-writer.
Every name triggers a separate field dynamic. To gather data ethically here is to practice self-splitting: a deliberate toggling between witness and participant.

Community members often ask whether I’m “back for work or healing.” The answer is both.
The boundary between observation and participation collapses when the field site is your childhood bus route and your interviewee remembers your first cane.


Methodological Challenges

1. Familiarity Bias – People who know me pre-research tend to curate their stories, omitting what they assume I already understand.
2. Projection Bias – My presence evokes their memories of Leah, the persona trained in control. Participants sometimes test whether that persona still exists.
3. Compassion Fatigue – Long-term engagement in trauma fields can dull response accuracy. To counter this, I schedule decompression periods and run transcript reviews through accessibility tools for emotional tone calibration.


Ethical Framework

I operate under a trauma-informed consent model: participants may retract, revise, or anonymize contributions at any stage.
Notes are logged with pseudonyms and sensory tags instead of demographics.
Because many subjects share overlapping disability and cult-exit identities, confidentiality depends less on redaction and more on context obfuscation—shifting small details without altering truth value.

Research here is reciprocal. Each conversation must leave the participant at least as grounded as before it began.


Reflexive Notes

Re-entry feels like walking through layered time: each street corner holds a version of me that once observed from survival, not scholarship.
To study that landscape now is to admit that method can never be fully clean.
Bias is not failure—it’s a variable to be documented.


TL;DR

Studying your own communities is both privilege and peril.
The insider lens grants clarity others can’t access, but it also demands radical transparency about motive, memory, and method.


Tags

#FieldNotes #Ethnography #ResearchEthics #TraumaInformed #Accessibility #Reflexivity #ProjectLeah #MeganWrites

Field Note 001: Origin Sector

Subtitle: On returning to Jersey, Project Leah, and the ethics of field safety

Researcher: Megan A. Green
Field location: North New Jersey corridor
Date: October 2025


Abstract

This field note documents the researcher’s re-entry into the New Jersey region for ongoing ethnographic study connected to Project Leah, a longitudinal case analysis of coercive influence, consent negotiation, and survivor agency within post-cult communities.
The entry contextualizes safety concerns, relational ties, and operational boundaries relevant to data integrity and participant well-being.


Field Narrative

Virtual bases: Marcela, CP, HT, the North Jersey blind crew.

Flying direct into NJ later this month. Already have people on my pingy-ping-ping list — camp friends, the CP crew. Let’s see who I can catch. Totally winging this other than my crash post in central Jersey.

For privacy reasons, I’ve been asked not to share rooming arrangements here. The safety risk is simply too high. I’ve reached a kind of micro-celebrity status — despite assertions to the contrary — and some in this community are demanding information that isn’t theirs to have. They’re endangering Project Leah with that carelessness, and it will not be tolerated.

That’s my mami-hat talking. Love you all like neighbors. I’m not trying to be heavy — but Project Leah’s strongest ties are in NJ, and they hold leverage that could make or break my ability to gather data for Leah’s case study. I’ve invested too much to let that happen.

My cult contacts for Leah are based in Jersey City. They maintain emotional ties to Rosie’s family and sometimes attempt to tug on those threads — some have known me since Mama Miri’s pregnancy. These individuals are persuasive and not above manipulation to lure Leah, whom they perceive as my full self, back into a cult network.

Leah was trained to lead. I carry her technical skill set and capacity for high-control strategy, but I also carry the ethical refusal to use it. Could I go undercover as Leah? Yes — but the emotional toll is steep. Friends stop hearing from me, they panic, and if I go too deep into Leah’s world, institutional intervention becomes a risk. That world is dangerous; avoidance is survival.

I’m grateful for the allies whose cooperation with Project Consent studies allows safer data collection without endangering active cult victims. Every supportive action contributes to a protective research environment.


TL;DR

Returning home feels powerful and precarious. Re-entry heightens risk to Project Leah and the behavioral profile built for its case study. I’m trusting my network to safeguard data and discretion.
Please keep project-related information secure and share nothing without consent.

With warmth and Jersey-girl sass,
Megan A. Green


Tags

#FieldNotes #Ethnography #CultSurvivor #Accessibility #ProjectLeah #MeganWrites #Research #Consent #TraumaStudies